Alternatives to in vivo assays for biosafety testing of biologics

Overview


Alternatives-to-in-vivo-assays-for-biosafety-testing-of-biologics.png

The use of animal models for the detection of adventitious agents has been a feature of biologic testing packages for many decades. However, as alternative methods such as PCR and NGS have emerged these in vivo tests have stubbornly remained a central part of testing. Here we examine the current in vivo methods and explore alternatives which can be employed today. We also propose that while the industry may be some years away from removing in vivo testing completely, a case could be made for removing animal use from very well-characterized production systems such as CHO.

This content is provided by Viral Safety for mAb: Prevent, Detect, Remove, and any views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of Biopharma-Reporter.com

Download Now


Related Resources

Rapid Biosafety Testing Enables the Future of Manufacturing

Rapid Biosafety Testing Enables the Future of Manufacturing

Content provided by Viral Safety for mAb: Prevent, Detect, Remove

White Paper

This white paper explores the factors driving the evolution toward faster biosafety testing and describes rapid approaches for adventitious agent testing during cell line characterization and BHLRT that are aligned with current and future manufacturing...

Blazar™ Platform: Rodent Virus Panel

Blazar™ Platform: Rodent Virus Panel

Content provided by Viral Safety for mAb: Prevent, Detect, Remove

White Paper

We have a long history of developing innovative molecular technologies for cell line characterization and lot release testing for the biopharmaceutical industry.

Supplier Info Centre

Viral-safety-for-mAb-Prevent-Detect-Remove.png

For more product information visit Viral Safety for mAb: Prevent, Detect, Remove.